Open source rant

See the great thing about scienceoffend_readers.jpg and technologycompetent_technophile.png jobs is our transparencyNotALieIfYouBelieveIt.jpg and focus on the problemWho's my boss?, not on the financePhD in Phrama finance.... You could saySay Anthing that the tech sector is very scientificTammyBrown.webp and rationaliKantEven.gif. You see, we rationalizeAggression... taking advantageWhy're all the good developers starving? of liberallyBuscemi.jpg licensedThereIsNoSpoon.png software.

We valueGoodGuyFSF.png open source softwareDigital Anti-trust because... it means we didn't have toHow much we value the backbone of 2018 tech write it. We express our value by not reciprocatingAt least they're competition in the Microsoft market and leveraging outside help/software to shrinkNot every exec is bad... ourM&A is so hot right now... R&DWhen capitalism has gone too far budgetWell.. something something pharma R&D blah blah... so operations doesn't yell at usHow operations/marketing thinks pharma profits are made LOL for making them money. After taking all the redit of saving money and time from our use of free and open source software, we're not given those savings back in order to augmentsocialism never works tho, so... publishPrivate Pyle has a full magazine!, and reciprocatekewl-aid. Don't get us wrong...we love transparencyNationalAnthem.png. The kind where others are transparent bu we don't have tohmm... invest in certain things on principle if it means we can tell our boss our budgets are flat or looks okay, so we can avoid supporting things we personally believe in but C suite doesn't. That's the only point I'm making... it doesn't smell good.

The only problemThe core of MS is closed-source, but the business model of Azure and MS software is tied to the nature of both open-source foundations and software licensing models to OEMs. In a sense, outsourcing the hardware through software licensing is the right decision business-wise... with F(L)OSS is that sometimes the UI is uglyYet another meme... or has longChange is an internal thing. Different things happen or transform, and music and art is a documentation of that - Matisyahu documentationDocs are a love letter that you write to your future self - Damian Conway, so we do the smart thing and pay other companiesTabbie.jpeg to dumb downtoxic, maybe? the interface or the nature of the calculations for the users. See we're scIenTistSChange my mind and areNugs not drugs reallyWhat are we gonna do today, Brain? smart#1. There's moar. Too smartuhhh... to waste time with rtfm or articulate#2. Well... things worked out i guess..../s what features we must have or why#3. I wasnt articulate or accomplished, i just started trying right then. Everything has been a race against time and sometimes youre not grown enough. And this stuff? I was just trying to improve my digital literacy since thats good for science. I hardly trust myself and my career because Im stuck at a desk trying to solve basic...very basic computer problems. the F(L)OSS stuff didn't meet all of our critieria#4. And then youre trying to self correct, which is the basist of el camino. But in reality we never talk about trajectory superficially OR in a true learning-trust kind of convo. And all the while Newtons thrid law is looming over you > 101 figurative ways....I mean.. I dont understand how the combustion engine works. The only things I have solid knowledge or opinions of are from heresay about macro/micro nutrition, metableism, and kitchen econ. We#5. But God, youre cute in glasses... but youre way too soft shop#6. Im helpless. Its funny for the first year or so... and then this stuff just gets dry, old, and toxic... like everyone else out there. Why cant you be someone positive anymore? around until something feels, right#7. I hate sitting this much but I can see the team better from here. rather than use objectiveI was always an unusual girl. My mother told me I had a chameleon soul, no moral compass pointing due north, no fixed personality; just an inner indecisiveness that was as wide and as wavering as the ocean. metrics about application usabilityGee, thanks!. If#8. If is an important word. And I can barely keep promises to my family, friends, and bosses. But here is what Id picture if I was responsible. F(L)OSS was so good, it wouldn't be freeObligatory Tim 'n Eric meme rightOhBoy.webp? It just feels saferHerp.jpeg when we can pay a companyBraaaaaaiiinsss to tellThanks, Id love 1000 high-quality lead compounds if you would. usPhilosoraptor On Evil K0rpos what the answers areHeHe HaHa! - some dwarf with a gun, probably.

We'reYou know the rules and so do I /s alsoProfessionalism 'n trade veryNight_at_the_ROX-bury.png scientificnotices... | Brrawghh! tooHow 2 Sciens MLG x-DropTheBasse-X. We experimentBoooom! ... wait... way too soon... with decreasinguw0t m8 number of replicatestest.jpg we useSee, we measured it once but was below and above the average... during screeningJust sitting here waiting.... It's actually very methodicalMFW replication crises are in the news.... We make sure to use conceptsuhhhh... that make sense to our operations overloardsUHHHHH.... like 'budgetI was told there'd be budget priorities...', 'amortizedThe math was pretty cool...', and 'assetwell.. damn...' to describe what it is we do for themTheres art and theres science.. generic caption idgaf.... And sometimes we give them back some of the money from 'research and development' whenever we can. God knowsMLG bizness x-0nlyProphits-in-AltCoin-x-$uck@lmao-X they can invent drugs faster than we canProfessionalism and traaaaaddddeee. xXxKYS.htmlxXx, so we should let them claim the credit for tightening the beltHonstly, I'm still a wannabe. Have you ever wanted to be something like real bad, but didnt understand how to get there? Or even that the philosophy and mantras parroted at the start manifest in much different ways when it comes to organizing, flexility, and process? Every journey is always described as 'bottom to the top' in some hierarchical journey.

SeeSure it looks delicious the thing aboutThere is no regularization screeningNo concept of precision, accuracy, or the role of repitition in science? Roll your own! is that youWhen the late night star understands favoritism in screening better than some... don't needEasy, guys... I put my pants on, just like th rest of you, one leg at a time. Except once my pants are on, I make good choices based on data... /s all the data you generate, rightLet me get this straight... you want to increate the number of candidates per dollar from a screen... by reducing the replicates to one?? Only 1% of the ideas in research work. So lOgiCally if you reduce the number of replicates by 50%Kitty cat likes our chemistry, you take away most of the expense from stuff you didn't care about anyways...... still relevant, the 99%. The 99% is all junkTrue negatives are important for a model. And need to be measured precisely. that doesn' provide useful... information... or serve a purpose of controls.... so we don't need to be that confidentIgnorance and sensitivity! I mean.... confidence! about the majority (99%) of our measurements. Or the 1% either. In the end we'll just keep screening like robots until we find something about our magic number cutoffhmmm... and then it either works or it doesn't! Don't worry about optimizing metricsOne does not, simply. like cost per true positive at all IRL or the reproducibility of some enrichment screen. It's not pragmatic. We serve at the pleasure of our investorsSomething something ass aids..., not the patients /s.